Upon reading Kim Dovey’s article titled “Tall Storeys” this week, I came to realize that there are no towering skyscrapers or extremely tall corporate-like buildings in Florence. What seem to be the tallest focal points of the city include the Duomo and the tops the churches. Madison, Wisconsin does not contain skyscrapers either. However, in my mind, Madison is merely a large town (barely a city), yet Florence is a quaint city (far too urban to be considered town-like). So I started to ask myself why I felt this way and a lot of it has to do with differences between building configurations, architectural feats, and aesthetics.
Madison is a college town that is constantly updating, rebuilding, and reconstructing pieces of its landscape in order to avoid becoming obsolete. To keep up with the times. Florence is an ancient Renaissance city that is constantly under construction for the purpose of restoration. Madison is focusing on moving into the future, while Florence is focusing on preserving the past. I don’t quite have an opinion on which ideology is best, but I find it interesting to think about.

When touring college campuses, my dad told me that many universities continue to remain under construction not only to update or repair old buildings or spaces, but to appeal to newcomers. If people are constantly thinking that the university is improving itself, they will want to stick around to see what comes of it. In reality, many elaborate projects take far longer than it takes to earn one undergraduate degree. But that doesn’t change the effect the presence of potential has upon the affect, or mood, of onlookers.

Now, when you look at the construction surrounding the Duomo, you might be upset that it is obstructing the view of your soon-to-be-posted-on-Instagram photos, but if you are going to be living in Florence for awhile, this frustration definitely masks a bit of enthusiasm and wonderment within you as to what might be to come. Personally, I believe the current construction going on near the Duomo is simply a ruse. I don’t believe there is anything else the astonishing Cathedral needs, unless it is somehow crumbling from its seemingly strong foundation and they are simply placing some pieces back together. To learn more about the history of the Duomo’s construction, I read a National Geographic article that goes a bit more into depth about its designs which were groundbreaking at the time.
Aside from Florence or Madison specifically, every city has their own unique markers that affect how people feel about such places. The condensed housing of tiny apartments, open parks, towering buildings, small shops, monuments, and maybe even smaller details such as the asphalt used to pave sidewalks. Dovey spoke about how “places embody power” in relation to the location of a corporate tower. If you think about businesses strategically placing themselves throughout urban spaces you might start to see an ebb and flow.

Smaller “local” bars and caffés stray away from tourist spots and usually exist within more residential areas. Gelateria’s within a piazza or square usually sell subpar gelato at higher prices than more authentic places hidden within narrow city streets. The location of specific businesses or buildings may seem to be natural or unintentional, but there are no coincidences in urban planning as cities feed off of the desires, needs, and emotions of their people.
If I learned anything from having an older brother with a degree in Real Estate it’s that the most important thing to remember are the three L’s: location, location, and location.
Hi Jill! I think this is a really interesting idea to write about and something I have not really thought about. It feels like so long ago that we were in Madison, and I have not thought about the architecture there compared to here in a while. I agree that Madison’s outlook on construction is to update and rebuild to maintain their appeal to residents and visitors, especially students who may want to attend the university. I mean they literally spent months doing construction on a fountain. Seeing this type of construction done on the Duomo also makes me confused, but if it is being done to preserve the past that adds up with a lot of traditions Florentine people have with maintaining their ways and keeping them special. Thanks for your post!
LikeLike
Hi Jill! I really enjoyed you’re blog this week! My grandma is a real estate agent so I also have heard the phrase location, location, location many times in my life. It is interesting to contrast the cities of Florence and Madison, restoration vs. renovation. I think it is impossible to say which one is better and really do agree that it is a case by case issue.
LikeLike
Hi Jill! Nice post! I enjoyed reading about your comparison of Madison and Florence. I loved how you talked about the idea that urban planning feeds off of people’s desires, needs and emotions. Before, I did not necessarily think of how important and symbolic the new construction in different places is and how it can have completely different meanings. I now plan to become more aware and ponder why certain things may be changing in certain areas as I feel it will help me understand places that much more.
LikeLike
Jill, I totally agree with your point of preservation. I too have always wondered how it might be more challenging in terms of city planning when dealing with an ancient city and culture like Italy. Whereas in the US, as a much younger country this fact of preservation is not as much of an issue.
LikeLike